I suppose you are being ironic in your post? Otherwise, I think it's a case of the pot calling the kettle black. The article referenced was only to demonstrate how the posts pissing on high VIP spenders was not appropriate given that they contribute a sizable portion of ucool's revenue when compared to the non-VIP and low-VIP players. It's a pretty common trend in this micro-transaction type of gaming environment. The discussion after that with estimated numbers was only to refute another poster's assumptions with her own views and estimates regarding who spent what and how much...
Might I add, nowhere during that discussion was it ever said that the numbers we were using were accurate or near actual figures. It was made clear that they were a hypothetical worse case scenario given a set of parameters and assumptions.
You, on the other hand, have presented a very specific figure but fail to quote your source for that information, and we are expected to trust that more? Please, don't be so condescending.
Your analysis and observations, which significantly point to a lack of accurate reading comprehension, could be used as the foundation for a textbook teaching remedial readers how to analyze and discern the meanings and intents behind that which they might read.