WC 5* or Panda 4* Arena team

[Sharko]

Well from what I hear is that after Orange promotion, WC once again surpasses Panda, due to excellent tanking gear instead of Panda's attack oriented gear.

Briefly, panda stays at P+4 if you want to use him as a tank, take him to orange if u need him as a support tank With WC.

[Agamerjes]

Well from what I hear is that after Orange promotion, WC once again surpasses Panda, due to excellent tanking gear instead of Panda's attack oriented gear.

Pretty accurate. Not sure what Ucool was thinking when they decided on Panda's orange gear, but it is a drastic shift from the P+4 setup. Fortunately, many of us have both WC and Panda, so we can adjust accordingly. Hurray for forward planning!

[Livingmore]

So, according to you guys, I should leave my Panda at P+4 to tank the Phoenix and give all the item to WC ?

[Agamerjes]

So, according to you guys, I should leave my Panda at P+4 to tank the Phoenix and give all the item to WC ?

P+4 panda = tank.
Orange panda = damage dealer.

Gear according to your needs. If you want an orange tank, WC works. If you want better orange damage, panda is your man... err bear.

[Sharko]

So, according to you guys, I should leave my Panda at P+4 to tank the Phoenix and give all the item to WC ?

I advise you so. At 88+ You need a sturdy tank, an off tank will surely hinder you and make you lose one more dps which for sure will do more damage than an off tank. Also since most people use WC in Orange, playing with two tanks will give WC double life steal which is a large drawback for you.

[retripala]

I advise you so. At 88+ You need a sturdy tank, an off tank will surely hinder you and make you lose one more dps which for sure will do more damage than an off tank. Also since most people use WC in Orange, playing with two tanks will give WC double life steal which is a large drawback for you.

+1
one question: Is panda+4 enchanted has enough hp and resistances to be one's main tank in 90? i mean, is he as good as an orange war chief for example?

[Dark_Seraphim]

did you check highlevel teams dude?

go for WC, he's a beast in end game meta. But it still depends who you are facing, if you need more sustain or more cc. Overall WC is still better

Yes, and WC is not the best at end game there's admiral and IH

And he said it was for his AS team so I suggested panda cause he synergizes more with AS than WC

[d3xter]

You might be right Dark_Seraphim but in my oppinion he already has some nice cc in his team (OC, MYS), so I'd prefer the sustain and damage

[Dark_Seraphim]

That's why I suggest he can replace mystic when he has panda

[d3xter]

That's why I suggest he can replace mystic when he has panda

Seems like I missed that. Sorry

But I still think WC has the edge ;P

[Livingmore]

+1
one question: Is panda+4 enchanted has enough hp and resistances to be one's main tank in 90? i mean, is he as good as an orange war chief for example?

41k hp, ~470 armor and 210 magic resist seems good enough. It's 100 armor less, and 8k hp more than Orange WC. Pretty tanky, right ?

[JoshXyrel]

That's confusing. I tend to favor Panda more due to decrease in dodge debuff to jumping enemy AS. Planning to replace Mys with a 5* SL soon. Still 30stones.

SL OC AS Com Panda for a defense Anti Sapper team.

Better suggestions?

[Livingmore]

That's confusing. I tend to favor Panda more due to decrease in dodge debuff to jumping enemy AS. Planning to replace Mys with a 5* SL soon. Still 30stones.

SL OC AS Com Panda for a defense Anti Sapper team.

Better suggestions?

Admiral, Cleric, IE, Silencer, Chaplain. Leave AS alone with Chaplain, IE will burst him down eventually.

[crazypary]

Admiral, Cleric, IE, Silencer, Chaplain. Leave AS alone with Chaplain, IE will burst him down eventually.

anyone tried which one tanky between chap and shaman versusing Sapper?
Im confuse which one that lasting longer at end game content

[Livingmore]

Which shaman ? With 45% damage reduction, I dont think there could be any other backline mage tougher than Chaplain.